Legal Opinion
Canteen Corp. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 2, 2003PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.
Canteen Corporation (Canteen) petitions for review from an order of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (Commission) finding that Canteen 'violated Section 5(a) of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (Act), 1 43 P.S. § 955(a), by unlawfully discriminating against Sophie Weber (Weber) when it failed to reasonably accommodate her disability..
The facts of this case are not in dispute. In 1985, Weber began working for Canteen, a Philadelphia based vending services supplier, as an accounting clerk. As an accounting clerk, Weber’s job required her to file stacks…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Dennis E. Gaul v. Lucent Technologies Inc. John Does 1-100 Jane Does 1-100 Abc Corp. Xyz CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Robert E. Bultemeyer v. Fort Wayne Community SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Gen. Elec. Corp. v. COM. PA. HUM. R. COM.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Casey's General Stores, Inc. v. BlackfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- Garner v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Raya & Haig Hair Salon v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Bebee v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Denniston Family Ltd. Partnership v. PAHRCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.