Garner v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
Dana Garner petitions for review of an adjudication of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission dismissing his discrimination complaint. The Commission concluded that Garner’s evidence did not establish a prima facie case of race-based discrimination on the part of his employer, Comcast of Willow Grove, Inc. (Comcast). Garner contends that Comcast disciplined its employees differently, depending upon the employee’s race. The Commission found, however, that Garner’s evidence simply did not support the inference that race was a factor in Garner’s dismissal and, thus,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Centurylink Public Communications, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Girard Finance Co. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Global TelLink Corp. v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- York v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- 1400 Main Holdings, LLC v. PA Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.