Legal Opinion

Horton v. City of Marshall

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 17, 1956No. 5-1090PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

The question here posed is the legal right of the appellant — city marshal ■— to demand a salary of $175.00 per month from the City of Marshall, Arkansas, -which is a city of the second class. We have several recent cases involving the matter of salaries for city marshals in cities of the second class. Some of these cases are: Thomas v. Sitton, 213 Ark. 816, 212 S. W. 2d 710; Conner v. Burnett, 216 Ark. 559, 226 S. W. 2d 984; Sitton v. Burnett, 216 Ark. 574, 226 S. W. 2d 544; Berryville v. Binam, 222 Ark. 962, 264 S. W. 2d 421; and Augusta v. Angelo, 225…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. SittonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  2. Conner v. BurnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Sitton v. BurnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  4. City of Berryville v. BinamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. Donnan v. DonnanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Greenbrier v. CottonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Jeffery v. City of Mt. ViewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. City of Leslie v. WattsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API