Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Sitton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided July 5, 1948No. 4-8586PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Appellee, Haskell Sitton, January 16,1948, filed “Petition for Writ of Mandamus” in the Van Burén Circuit Court, in which he alleged that he was the duly appointed and acting City Marshal of Clinton. “That he was employed by the City Council and has served in the capacity of Marshal since 1st day of May, 1946, and that he was serving as such Marshal in December, 1947; that his fixed salary was and is $250 per month payable semi-monthly on the 1st and the 15th of each month; that the said city paid him until December, 1947, and that the respondent, (appellant) J. A. Thomas, who is the City…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Hall v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Weeks v. TexarkanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Rhoden v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Hill v. RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Davis v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Sitton v. BurnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- City of Berryville v. BinamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Looper v. ThrashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- City of Augusta v. AngeloSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.