Conner v. Burnett
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
This is a companion case to Sitton v. Burnett, also decided today. That case involved Sitton’s salary during a period when he was serving as cle facto marshal of the city of Clinton. He h'as since become a cle jure officer, by moving into the city and being elected to the office. This taxpayer’s suit was brought by the appellee to enjoin the city council and city treasurer from paying Sitton a salary of $250 a month for his services as city marshal. It is the appellee’s contention that a city of the second class is not authorized to pay its marshal a salary. The council members, treasurer and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Weeks v. TexarkanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- City of El Dorado v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
3Cited by24 opinions
- Burke v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- City of Greenbrier v. CottonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Horton v. City of MarshallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- City of Jacksonville v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.