Legal Opinion

Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Young

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 27, 1984No. 64140PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

456 So.2d 1175 (1984)

OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC., Petitioner,

v.

Marcia YOUNG, Respondent.

No. 64140.

Supreme Court of Florida.

September 27, 1984.

Stanley A. Beiley, Richard E. Brodsky and David S. Garbett of Paul, Landy, Beiley, & Harper, P.A., Miami, for petitioner.

Mercedes C. Busto of Bailey & Dawes, Miami, for respondent.

SHAW, Justice.

This is a petition to review Young v. Oppenheimer & Co., 434 So.2d 369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), on the ground it conflicts with Raymond, James & Associates v. Maves, 384 So.2d 716 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), and Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Melamed, 405 So.2d 790…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Tyson v. LanierSupreme Court of Florida · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Barnebey v. E.F. Hutton & Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
  2. W. Floyd Messer, Sr., Individually v. E.F. Hutton & Co., a Delaware Corporation, Raphael M. Kelly, Individually, Henry Herschaft, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Brown v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1985
  4. Intracoastal Ventures Corp. v. Safeco Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Finn v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API