Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Exxon Corp.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided August 8, 1994No. Civ. A. 94-406-APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR REMAND
JOHN V. PARKER, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on a motion by plaintiffs for remand. The motion is opposed. There is no need for oral argument. Removal jurisdiction is allegedly based upon diversity of citizenship.
On March 31, 1994, plaintiffs, Yvonne and Alvin Mitchell, filed this action in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Plaintiffs seek to recover damages'for personal injuries allegedly sustained by Mrs. Mitchell on April 1, 1993, in a fire and explosion that occurred while she was working for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Bazley v. TortorichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Thais Carriere, Widow of Samuel Carriere, Iv, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Simoneaux v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bourque v. Nan Ya Plastics Corp., AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1995
- Kimball v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1996
- Mitchell v. Exxon Corp.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1995
- McLin v. H & H LURE CO.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2000
- Pate v. Adell Compounding, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.