Legal Opinion
Pate v. Adell Compounding, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided July 14, 1997No. Civil Action No. 97-132-B-M1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
POLOZOLA, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion to remand. Defendants timely removed this suit from the Twenty First Judicial District, Parish of Livingston, State of Louisiana.1 For the reasons which follow, the plaintiffs’ motion to remand is denied.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On September 20, 1996, plaintiffs, Ulysses and Kathy Pate, filed this suit in state court against Adell Compounding, Inc. (“Adell”), DSM Copolymer, Inc. (“Copolymer”), Aristech Chemical, Inc. (“Aristeeh”), and John Doe Manufacturing…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Bazley v. TortorichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Thais Carriere, Widow of Samuel Carriere, Iv, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Jernigan v. Ashland Oil Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Burden v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moreno Energy, Inc. v. Marathon Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Andrews v. AmercoDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Garcia v. Westlake Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2019