Legal Opinion

State v. Hobbs

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 2015No. S-1-SC-35708; Docket 33,715PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VANZI, Judge.

{1} The Legislature has delegated to the Scientific Laboratory Division of the Department of Health (SLD) administrative authority over blood and breath tests administered to persons suspected of driving while under the influence of intoxicants. See NMSA 1978, § 24-1-22 (2003). In State v. Martinez, 2007-NMSC-025, 141 N.M. 713, 160 P.3d 894, our Supreme Court held that “a threshold showing” that the instrument used to administer a breath alcohol test (BAT) was SLD-certified at the time of the test is a Rule 11-104(A) NMRA foundational requirement for admission of the BAT…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DedmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. BullcomingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. WillieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Town of Taos v. WisdomNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. City of Santa Fe v. DeanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Gemini Las Colinas, LLC v. N.M. Tax'n & Revenue Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API