Legal Opinion

State v. . Darnell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Devin, J., at Spring Term, 1913, of Eobstth.

1Opinion of the CourtClabK, C. J.

On 5 July, 1912, tbe board of aldermen of Winston, N. C., adopted an ordinance wbicb made it unlawful for any colored person to occupy as a residence any bouse upon any street or alley between two adjacent streets on wbicb a greater number of bouses are occupied as residences by white people than are occupied ais residences by colored people. Another section of tbe ordinance made a similar restriction against white people occupying as residences bouses on streets where there are more bouses occupied by colored residents than by whites. In 1913 tbe defendant William Darnell, a colored man,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. State v. . WebberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. A. T. Bruce & Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  5. State v. . LangstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carey v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  2. Meade v. DennistoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  3. Porter v. BarrettMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Hickman v. WellauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State v. . GulledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API