State v. . Darnell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Devin, J., at Spring Term, 1913, of Eobstth.
1Opinion of the CourtClabK, C. J.
On 5 July, 1912, tbe board of aldermen of Winston, N. C., adopted an ordinance wbicb made it unlawful for any colored person to occupy as a residence any bouse upon any street or alley between two adjacent streets on wbicb a greater number of bouses are occupied as residences by white people than are occupied ais residences by colored people. Another section of tbe ordinance made a similar restriction against white people occupying as residences bouses on streets where there are more bouses occupied by colored residents than by whites. In 1913 tbe defendant William Darnell, a colored man,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- State v. . WebberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- A. T. Bruce & Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- State v. . LangstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carey v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Meade v. DennistoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Porter v. BarrettMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Hickman v. WellauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. . GulledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.