Tiedtke Bros. v. Shirley-Skeldon Dredging & Submarine Contracting Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, District Judge.
The libel and intervening libel herein each- claims a maritime lien against the respondent dredge for sums alleged to be due for supplies and services, respectively, furnished to said respondent. The libels aver that said dredge is a vessel engaged in the business of commerce and navigation. It is also alleged that the supplies were necessary to enable the respondent to continue in the business in which she was then engaged, and that the services were rendered by the intervening libelants as members of her crew. The *900answer asserts that this court is without jurisdiction…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Hall Bros. Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- In re Hydraulic Steam Dredge No. 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
- Bouker Contracting Co. v. Proceeds of Sale of Dredging MachineDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1909
- South Florida Dredging Co. v. American Steel Dredge No. 77District Court, S.D. Florida · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Butler v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- JC Penney-Gwinn Corporation v. McArdleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
- General Engine & MacHine Works, Inc. v. SlayDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1963
- Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. BoudreauxTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Henderson Bros. v. Tipple Boat, No. 2District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.