Legal Opinion

Bouker Contracting Co. v. Proceeds of Sale of Dredging Machine

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty. On petition for proceeds.

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, District Judge.

The petition sets forth that the petitioner intervenes for its interests in the proceeds of a dredging machine now in the registry of this court; that the petitioner is a corporation of .the state of New Jersey, engaged in maritime contract work in and about the bay of New York; that the dredging machine above mentioned was owned by the Morrison Dredging Company, a corporation of New York, which was engaged in the business of dredging out or filling in of channels or other water ways in and about the harbor of New York and adjacent waters; that in the month of December,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Cleveland Terminal & Valley Railroad Co. v. Cleveland Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. The "Edith."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. The PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tiedtke Bros. v. Shirley-Skeldon Dredging & Submarine Contracting Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923
  2. South Florida Dredging Co. v. American Steel Dredge No. 77District Court, S.D. Florida · 1923
  3. The DixieDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API