Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Ditillo
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
We note that Reliance failed to file their notice of appeal within thirty days from the judgment as required by N.C.R. App. P. 3. However, in our discretion and pursuant to N.C.R. App. P. 2, 21, we treat Reliance’s appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and allow the petition in the interest of justice.
We first consider whether the trial court erred in its conclusion that defendant-employees’ potential uninsured motorist benefits were subject to a lien in favor of the workers’ compensation carrier, Reliance, pursuant to G.S. 97-10.2. While applying G.S. 97-10.2, decisions…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Sproles v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Hieb v. LowerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Crowder v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Bray v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. DitilloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Richardson v. MAXIM HEALTHCARE/ALLEGISCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. DitilloCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997