Legal Opinion

Kroll v. Vanden Berg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1953No. Docket 66, Calendar 45,713PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

Plaintiff brought this suit to recover damages suffered by reason of claimed malpractice by defendant. Prom a verdict directed for defendant by the court, under the statute of limitations, plaintiff appeals. The malpractice alleged was the leaving of a part of a broken surgical needle in the abdominal cavity of plaintiff during and following an operation of supracervical hysterectomy.

Plaintiff, a single woman aged 44, brought suit on December 6, 1951, against defendant, a practising physician and surgeon of Grand Rapids. In 1933, plaintiff had had a tumor removed from the wall of the uterus…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weast v. DuffieMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. William J. Emmett, Administrator of the Estate of Joseph N. Emmett v. Eastern Dispensary and Casualty HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Gruener v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. Harold Echols v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API