Legal Opinion
Harold Echols v. Chrysler Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 27, 1980No. 77-1529PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRY PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellant Harold Echols filed this action April 1, 1976, under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, against the Chrysler Corporation, his former employer, and the United Automobile Workers of America and its Local No. 212. Chrysler was charged with violating the collective bargaining agreement in various particulars. The Union was charged with failure to represent Echols fairly “in that the Union, in a grossly negligent and malicious and dishonest manner” settled plaintiff’s discharge agreement on February 29, 1969, and in refusing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Connelly v. Paul Ruddy's Equipment Repair & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
- De Haan v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- International Union United Automobile Workers v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Smith v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Badon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Raymond Hicks v. Hines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Aaron Pitts v. Frito-Lay, Inc., Bakery and Confectionary Workers' International Union of America, Detroit Bakers' Union Factory Local 326Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Adkins v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.