Legal Opinion
Duke City Lumber Company v. Earl Butz, Secretary of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 6, 1976No. 74-2066PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Per curiam
This suit, now pending for over three years, attacks the validity of the 1971 changes in the small business timber set-aside program as established by the Memorandum of Understanding between the Small Business Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture. The appellants are twelve forest product manufacturing companies that are not eligible for set-aside sales under the program because they exceed the fixed standard of 500 employees or less in measuring the eligibility of a business to participate. 13 C.F.R. 121.3-9(b). They assert that a new triggering mechanism for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Toilet Goods Ass'n v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of AlabasterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City Of AlabasterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- City of Santa Clara v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Realty Income Trust v. EckerdCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Arctic Corner, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.