Commonwealth v. Brantley

NILON, J,

The commonwealth, hereinafter “appellant”, argues that the court erred in granting the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. The police conducted a custodial interrogation without providing Miranda warnings to the defendant and the defendant never voluntarily consented to the warrantless seizure of her cellular telephone by the police. Therefore, the appellant’s contentions are meritless.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

This is an appeal from this court’s order imposed on December 22,2011. The nature and history of the case are as follows:

On June 1,2011, a criminal complaint was…