Caterpillar Inc. v. Jerryco Footwear, Inc.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court for decision following the September 16 and 26,1994 evidentiary hearings on Rugged Footwear Company’s and Jonathan Werman’s Motion to Vacate or Modify the Court’s Preliminary Injunction Order entered September 2, 1994. Rugged’s and J. Werman’s Motion to Vacate or Modify the Court’s Preliminary Injunction Order (# 65) is DENIED. In rendering this decision, the Court has considered the testimony of the witnesses, the documents admitted into evidence, argument by counsel, Rugged and J. Werman’s Proposed Findings of Fact, and Caterpillar…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. NeapolitanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. ALA. DEPT. OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCESSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Connor v. ShalalaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- SMC Corp., Ltd. v. LOCKJAW, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007