Legal Opinion

Brink v. Brink

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1984No. A016466PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that when the award of community property of a marital dissolution judgment is vacated in an independent proceeding in equity, the court is acting as a court of equity and is not mandated to follow the provisions of the Family Law Act in dividing the property of the parties.

The marriage of Bonnie and Billie Brink ended with a judgment of dissolution on January 20, 1977, in which the court incorporated the marital settlement agreement of the parties. The agreement provided that Billie would receive as his separate property most of the community property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Caldwell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Henn v. HennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rubenstein v. RubensteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Kinoshita v. HorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. In Re Marriage of BergmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Kuehn v. KuehnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. In Re Marriage of McNeillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API