Legal Opinion

Noren v. Sillitoe

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 26, 1945No. Docket 148/427PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant, Amanda Noren, is the executrix named and who qualified under the will of Betty Carlson. The bill of complaint requests construction of the will and advice in two respects: (1) the nature of the estate given thereunder to complainant, and (2) whether complainant as executrix was given power to sell real property.

Aside from the real property mentioned in her will which was of the value of about $6,000 encumbered by a mortgage upon which the balance due was $427.59, the personal property of the deceased at the time of the making of her will did not exceed the sum of $200. At the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peer v. JenkinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  2. Gaston v. FordNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  3. Pratt v. DouglasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1884
  4. Girard Trust Co. v. CheesemanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921
  5. Aspinwall v. AspinwallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goeke v. PiersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API