Legal Opinion

Crouch v. Ohio National Life Insurance

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 4, 1968No. Civ. No. 67-278Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND FINDINGS

KILKENNY, District Judge:

Plaintiff prosecutes this action to recover on the double indemnity provision in her husband’s life insurance policy with the defendant. The insured paid $250.10 per annum for the ordinary life coverage of $5,000.00. This feature of the policy is without restriction, as to cause of death, after the policy was in effect for two years. For an additional annual premium of $9.00, he received double indemnity or an additional coverage of $5,000.00, with restricted provisions as to the cause of death.1 The law suit concerns itself only with the liability…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. LaBarge v. United InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Todd v. Occidental Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Trevathan v. Mutual Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Fries v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Finley v. Business Men's Assurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API