Legal Opinion

Trevathan v. Mutual Life Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1941PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

On May 10, 1937, the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, the defendant herein, issued a policy in the sum of $1000 on the life of Clarence E. Trevathan, the husband of the plaintiff, in which she was named as beneficiary. The policy was in the form of an annual dividend, ordinary life policy, providing for the payment of double indemnity in case of the death of the insured by accident. The insured died on April 15, 1939, from injuries received in a collision between a motorcycle driven by him and a truck. On notice of the insured’s death, the defendant paid to the plaintiff the sum of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bohaker v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Hanley v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Van Riper v. Constitutional Government LeagueWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Kellogg v. WitteWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Lee v. SeverynsWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Allstate Insurance v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Botts v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. PietrantonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Demmith v. Wisconsin Judicial ConferenceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API