Legal Opinion

Woin v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1935No. 7,372PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

On May 2, 1924, Jack Woin, an employee of the Anaconda Copper Mining Company, was injured while engaged in his work as a miner at the Tramway mine in Butte. The company was operating under plan 1 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Rev. Codes 1921, sec. 2816 et seq., as amended). Woin was in good health and ordinary physical condition at the time of the accident. He had worked in and about the mines at Butte since about tbe year 1907. Most of this time he had worked at the Tramway. When the accident occurred Woin and his partner were engaged in cleaning waste matter from a raise in the mine.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dosen v. East Butte Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Moffett v. Bozeman Canning Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Birdwell v. Three Forks Portland Cement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Morgan v. Butte Central Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Exchange State Bank v. Occident Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ricks v. Teslow ConsolidatedMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Tweedie v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Newman v. KampMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hurlbut v. Vollstedt Kerr CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Brennan v. MayoMontana Supreme Court · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API