Legal Opinion

Scoville v. Fisher

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1967No. 36434PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

Plaintiff brings this action is equity to establish a prescriptive easement for ingress and egress and other purposes over defendants’ appurtenant town lot in the business section of Hartington, Nebraska. The trial court denied her relief and she appeals. We affirm the judgment.

Defendants own Lot 13, Block 30 of the Original Town of Hartington, 25 feet wide, facing west on Washington Avenue, the main business artery of the town. To the east and rear of their building on this lot is an unimproved and unenclosed (until June 1965) area designated areas Al and A2 on exhibit 1, which is the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Pirman v. ConferNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Anson v. TietzeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  4. Town of Paden City v. FeltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Sachs v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Svoboda v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Fischer v. Voldemars GrinsbergsNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Gerberding v. SchnakenbergNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Sturm v. MauNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Smith v. BixbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API