Legal Opinion

Seattle & Montana Railway Co. v. Murphine

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1892No. 348PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish County, The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, C. J. —

This was a proceeding by appellant to appropriate a strip one hundred feet wide across the lands of respondents for the purpose of a right-of-way for its railroad. The land consists of a single enclosure containing about twenty-five or thirty acres. It lies in the valley of theStilaguamishriver,in Snohomish county,and islowand level agricultural land, and especially adapted to the raising of hay, for which purpose it seems to have been used for several years. It was also used as a pasture for stock during several months of each year.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Alloway v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Harrison v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  5. McReynolds v. Burlington & Ohio River Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In re Westlake AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Lewis Clark County v. NettMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State ex rel. Ami Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Laser v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API