Carson Harbor Village Ltd., a California Limited Partnership, Dba Carson Harbor Village Mobile Home Park v. City of Carson, a Municipal Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Carson Harbor Village Ltd. appeals the dismissal of its complaint alleging that laws regulating mobile home parks in the City of Carson, California violate the Due Process and Takings Clauses of the United States Constitution. We affirm.
I
Carson Harbor Village Ltd. (“Carson Harbor”) owns a mobile home park containing 409 rental spaces in the City of Carson (“city”). Residents of the park own their mobile homes but rent spaces from Carson Harbor. Despite their name, mobile homes are largely immobile. As a practical matter, moving one is expensive and difficult. Once in…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- WMX Technologies, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Garneau v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Wmx Technologies, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.