Navarra v. Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLS, Judge.
By this appeal appellant poses the single question of whether a motor scooter is encompassed within the general phrase “automobile” or within the exclusionary phrase “motorcycle” in construing an insurance policy.
Appellant-Plaintiff Navarra was injured in a vehicle! accident while operating a motor scooter in Holly Hill, Florida. He was covered under a group insurance policy issued by defendant insurance company, which policy provided hospital benefits for injuries resulting by reason of an automobile accident. The salient clause provided for benefits if the injuries were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bullard v. Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Eclipse Mach. Co. v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
- Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. KingAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Standifer v. Inter-Ocean Ins. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Texas Casualty Insurance Company v. WybleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stuyvesant Insurance Company v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. CarterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Loftus v. Pennsylvania Life Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Pistorius v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Pistorius v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985