Legal Opinion
Krottner v. Starbucks Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 14, 2010No. 09-35823, 09-35824PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-Appellants Laura Krottner, Ishaya Shamasa, and Joseph Lalli appeal the district court’s dismissal of their negligence and breach of contract claims against Starbucks Corporation. Plaintiffs-Appellants are current or former Starbucks employees whose names, addresses, and social security numbers were stored on a laptop that was stolen from Starbucks. Their complaints allege that, in failing to protect Plaintiffs-Appellants’ personal data, Starbucks acted negligently and breached an implied contract under Washington law.
Affirming the district court, we…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Denney v. Deutsche Bank AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Maya v. Centex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Richard Beck v. Robert McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Jean Resnick v. AvMed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Katz v. Pershing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.