Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Beach
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.
Action by appellee against appellant to recover damages for personal injuries. In addition to the *674necessary formal allegations, it is averred in the complaint, in substance, that appellee was in the employ and service of appellant in interstate commerce, in the capacity of assistant maintainer of signals, which signals were in use by appellant as a part of its equipment for the operation and control of its trains; that John Rowe was appellant’s foreman of signal maintenance, and, on January 21, 1925, Rowe and appellee, as appellant’s employees and in line of their duties as such, were…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rees v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Terre Haute, Etc., Traction Co. v. McDermottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Stremmel v. Gaar, Scott & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Tozer v. Hobbs' EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Wilson v. KesterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.