Stremmel v. Gaar, Scott & Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From Washington Circuit Court; Thomas B. Buskirk, Judge. Suit by Caar, Scott & Co. against George W. -Stremmel. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.
The only error assigned and not waived calls in question the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. It is insisted by appellant that the “decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence,” and that it “is contrary to law.”' No other causes assigned for a new trial are urged as grounds for reversal of the judgment.
These causes for a new trial depend for their determination on the evidence which is not in the record. Appellee recovered judgment against appellant. Afterward appellant filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled by the court, to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Vandalia Coal Co. v. YemmIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bass v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Inter State Motor Freight System v. HenryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Wilson v. KesterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Shaw v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Kubisz v. PomorskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.