Legal Opinion

Kappelmeier v. HSBC USA, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 10, 2006No. A06A0463PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

This case provides yet another example of the inherent dangers of proceeding pro se. Gottfried Kappelmeier filed a pro se RÍCO complaint against multiple defendants, including four banks, two businesses, and four individuals. In a series of orders, the trial court dismissed all defendants. Following the most recent order, Kappelmeier appealed. Given the fundamental shortcomings of Kappelmeier’s brief, we are compelled to affirm.

The relevant facts show that Kappelmeier initially filed suit against the following defendants: HSBC USA, Inc. d/b/a HSBC Bank, USA Visa Gold; HSBC…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Felix v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Georgia Building Services, Inc. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Rockdale County v. Water Rights Committee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Bailey v. McNealyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Johnson v. Aurora Loan Services Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. GMC Group, Inc. v. Harsco Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. First Specialty Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Fritz v. ShadwichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Thompson v. Salacoa Highland Property Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Kappelmeier v. PDQ Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API