Legal Opinion
Ke-Sun Oil Co. v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1932No. 6753PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
The'Oeneral American Tank Car Corporation brought an action against the Sunburst Oil & Refining Company for the appointment of a receiver for the management of the affairs of the latter corporation. It alleged that the Sunburst Oil & Refining Company, which wo will hereinafter refer to as the “oil company,” is indebted to it upon an unsecured claim for $76,517.62 for rent of its tank cars. It alleged that the oil company owns and operates an oil refinery at Great Falls, Mont.; that it owns large interests in oil and gas lands, leases, royalties, and oil well drilling…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Covell v. HeymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Newberry v. Davison Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- In Re Terrace Superette, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1964
- Myers v. H. L. Rust Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1943
- Simons v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- 1st National Credit Corp. v. Von HakeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1981