Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Prudential Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1946No. 9983, 9984PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
These two proceedings, involving in each case -the validity of the action of the National Labor Relations Board in designating the unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining, arise out of the same series of facts and are considered together. Each case is before the Court upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, § 160(e) Title 29 U.S.C.A., for enforcement of its order of June 30, 1944 issued against The Prudential Insurance Company of America, respondent, following the usual…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Botany Worsted MillsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sanson Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. SidranCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Vulcan Forging Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. J. W. Rex CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- National Labor Relations Board v. Royal Oak Tool & MacHine Company, R O Manufacturing Company, Wendell G. Mouw, Garrett H. Mouw and Robert J. WallsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.