Legal Opinion

Harshberger v. Tarrson

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 26, 1950No. 10081PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, owner of ■ certain patents on safety razors, brought suit charging defendants with infringement and with violation of plaintiff’s alleged rights under the Fair Trade Act of Illinois, Smith-Hurd’s Rev. Stat. Chap. 121%, Secs. 188 to 191 incl. He sought also recovery, as he says, “for grave damage to and impairment of plaintiff’s property interest and good will attaching to his inventions and the patents in suit resulting from the unlawful acts of defendants.” The District Court, upon defendants’ dual motion for summary judgment and to dismiss the complaint,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. General Talking Pictures Corp. v. Western Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mitchell v. HawleySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Keeler v. Standard Folding Bed Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Harshberger v. TarrsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1994
  2. Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992
  3. Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Hooker Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
  4. United Mfg. & Service Co. v. Holwin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Unilectric, Inc., by Change of Name From United Mfg. And Service Co. v. Holwin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API