Legal Opinion
Mertens v. Black
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 4, 1991No. Nos. 90-16359, 90-16437 and 90-16439PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
Participants in the Kaiser Steel Retirement Plan (“the Plan”) brought this action to restore to the Plan losses allegedly resulting from breaches of fiduciary duty by members of the Plan’s Investment Committee. Appellants, eleven individual members of the Plan’s Investment Committee, appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment. 744 F.Supp. 917. Appellants contend the prior judgment in Horan v. Kaiser Steel Retirement Plan, on appeal as Koch v. Kaiser Steel Retirement Plan, No. 89-56115 et seq., has preclusive effect here and bars relitigation of the ERISA…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Itt Rayonier, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Bernice Sokol v. Jacob L. Bernstein, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bowles v. ReadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Estate of Silvio Ravetti v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Carr v. International Game TechnologyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2011
- Chemtech Industries, Inc. v. Goldman Financial Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.