Misiak v. Freeh
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Roy Joseph Misiak, a Michigan prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order dismissing his action for a writ of mandamus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1361. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Misiak filed suit against Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) Director Louis J. Freeh and Attorney General Janet Reno in October 2000. He sought an order compelling the defendants to perform the duties of their…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Darryl McGore v. Gene L. Wrigglesworth, Chief Sheriff Richard Chinelli, Administrator Ingham County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Evans, Jr. v. Roberts, Jr.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Fedorova v. FoleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
- Fedorova v. FoleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
- HOSIE WILLIAMS v. CORRECTIONAL RECEPTION CENTER, et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- Hooker v. Michigan, State ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.