Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mississippi Mun. Liability Plan v. Jordan

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2003No. 2001-IA-01590-SCTPublished

1Dissent

¶ 28. The chancery court had jurisdiction to hear this case under the Mississippi Tort Claims Act (MTCA), Miss. Code Ann. §§ 11-46-1 to -23 (Rev. 2002 Supp. 2003). Notwithstanding my agreement that the policy in question is a form of a self-insurance plan, the majority has misinterpreted the MTCA in determining that liability here is capped at $50,000. In addition, direct action against MMLP was proper in this case. Accordingly, I dissent.

CHANCERY COURT JURISDICTION

¶ 29. The Legislature has not precluded the chancery courts from hearing MTCA cases. See Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-13(1).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pruett v. City of RosedaleMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Morgan v. City of RulevilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Antiporek v. Village of HillsideIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. LAWRENCE COUNTY SCHOOL DIST. v. BristerMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  5. City of Ridgeland v. FowlerMississippi Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API