Mississippi Mun. Liability Plan v. Jordan
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Dissent
¶ 28. The chancery court had jurisdiction to hear this case under the Mississippi Tort Claims Act (MTCA), Miss. Code Ann. §§ 11-46-1 to -23 (Rev. 2002 Supp. 2003). Notwithstanding my agreement that the policy in question is a form of a self-insurance plan, the majority has misinterpreted the MTCA in determining that liability here is capped at $50,000. In addition, direct action against MMLP was proper in this case. Accordingly, I dissent.
CHANCERY COURT JURISDICTION
¶ 29. The Legislature has not precluded the chancery courts from hearing MTCA cases. See Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-13(1).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pruett v. City of RosedaleMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
- Morgan v. City of RulevilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Antiporek v. Village of HillsideIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- LAWRENCE COUNTY SCHOOL DIST. v. BristerMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Ridgeland v. FowlerMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.