Legal Opinion

Moore v. Crumpton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1982No. 76PA82PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The most significant issue presented by this case is whether a parent of an unemancipated minor child may be held liable in damages for failing to take reasonable steps to exercise control over the child’s behavior. We conclude that a parent may be held liable in such situations, if the parent knows or should know that he or she has the ability and opportunity to control the child and knows or should know of the necessity for exercising such control.

The plaintiff brought this personal injury action against the defendant, John C. Crumpton, Jr. and his parents, the defendants…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Linville v. . NissenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Brittingham v. . StadiemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. K.H. v. J.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Stein v. Asheville City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Bridges v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
  5. K.H. v. J.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API