Legal Opinion

State v. Sprinkle

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1980No. 7921SC1172PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant assigns error to the denial of his timely motions for judgment as of nonsuit. At the trial of this matter, the State offered evidence which tended to show that, when Ms. Lynch left for work on the morning of 28 March 1979, the doors to her home were secure; that when she returned that afternoon, she found her home had been broken into; and that certain items of personal property which were in her home that morning were missing that afternoon. State’s witnesses Thomas Allen and Bob Brown testified they had driven by the Lynch residence about 2:00 p.m. that day and had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. State v. BeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PaitCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. HootsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. OakleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. CoatsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API