Legal Opinion
State v. Actavis Pharma, Inc. & a.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 30, 2017No. 2016-0199PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, C.J.
The State appeals, and the defendants, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., cross-appeal, an order of the Superior Court ( Nicolosi , J.) denying the State's motion to enforce administrative subpoenas issued to the defendants under the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), RSA chapter 358-A (2009 & Supp. 2016), and granting the defendants' motion for a protective order. We reverse and remand.
I
The relevant facts follow. In June 2015, the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) retained the law firm of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Birch Broadcasting, Inc. v. Capitol Broadcasting Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Main HurdmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Bankers Management Co v. Eric HeryfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Conduent State & Local Solutions, Inc. v. New Hampshire Department of Transportation & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- In re GuillemetteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- Bedford School District & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- Fred S. Teeboom v. City of Nashua Daniel Moriarty v.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019