Legal Opinion

State v. Panos

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 12, 2016No. 1 CA-CR 15-0065PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JONES, Judge:

¶ 1 Theodore Panos challenges the superi- or court’s imposition of a monthly probation service fee as a condition of his unsupervised probation. Panos argues Arizona Revised Statutes (AR.S.) section ÍS^OIJA), 1 which requires the fee, is unconstitutional under both the U.S. and Arizona Constitutions. For the reasons that follow, we find the statute to be constitutional and affirm the imposition of the fee.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 The State initially charged Panos in the superior court with two class six felonies: possession or use of marijuana in violation of AR.S.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brush & Nib v. PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  2. Loncar v. DuceyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API