Legal Opinion

Chism v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided August 14, 2025No. 2:20-cv-00967Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 MICHELLE CHISM, Case No. 2:20-cv-00967-ART-DJA 4 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 5 COSTCO WHOLESALE 6 CORPORATION, 7 Defendant. 8 In this personal injury lawsuit, Plaintiff Michelle Chism seeks a spoliation 9 jury instruction (ECF No. 57). The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s request for 10 a spoliation instruction (ECF No. 63) and instructed parties to file supplemental 11 briefing regarding the type of jury instruction. For the following reasons, the 12 Court finds that an adverse inference jury instruction is the appropriate remedy. 13 I.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont Corporation, Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
  3. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  4. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  5. Peschel v. City of MissoulaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API