Legal Opinion · Dissent

Playle v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 16, 1989No. CO-88-2333Published

1DissentRandall, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The only issue in this case is whether the Burger King employee provided reliable and credible information which provided the police officer with a particularized and objective basis for suspecting respondent of criminal activity. See Marben v. State, Department of Public Safety, 294 N.W.2d 697, 699 (Minn.1980) (unidentified trucker called to police officer on CB and identified a particular car as having “tailgated” him for several miles); see also State v. Davis, 393 N.W.2d 179 (Minn.1986) (passenger in car passing a police car hollered to officer that a red car…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Olson v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. BarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. City of Minnetonka v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API