Legal Opinion

City of Minnetonka v. Shepherd

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 1988No. C8-87-1694PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

We granted the petition of the state to review the unpublished decision of the court of appeals which affirmed the trial court’s suppression of chemical test results in the prosecution of defendant Paul Cummings Shepherd for DWI. Agreeing with the trial court, the court of appeals held that the stop which led to defendant’s arrest and to the taking of the chemical test was illegal because it was based on an unreliable telephone tip from an informant. Holding that the tip was sufficiently reliable to justify the stop, we reverse the court of appeals and remand for trial.

Mi…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Olson v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. United States v. Thurlester WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. State v. TimberlakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Playle v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. State v. BolanosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API