Allen, Gibbs & Houlik, L.C. v. Ristow
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J.:
In this appeal we are asked to determine if the district court erred when it granted summary judgment in favor of Kim berly A. Ristow after her former employer, Allen, Gibbs & Houlik, L.C., attempted to enforce a noncompetition clause in its employment agreement. Because there was no legitimate business purpose for AGH that was protected by the covenant not to compete, under the facts of this case, we hold that enforcing the covenant would be unreasonable. Therefore, we affirm the district courts’ grant of summary judgment to Ristow.
BACKGROUND
Ristow was hired in 1994 by AGH, a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Unrau v. Kidron Bethel Retirement Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Vantage Technology, LLC v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Boisen v. Petersen Flying Service, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wichita Clinic, P.A. v. LouisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- Ives v. McGannonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
- Business Communications, Inc. v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
- ConvergeOne, Inc. v. Logicalis, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- ISG Technology, Inc. v. Secure Data Technologies, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.