Legal Opinion

Boisen v. Petersen Flying Service, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1986No. 84-707PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

Douglas Boisen commenced an action for declaratory judgment, see Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-21,149 et seq. (Reissue 1979), seeking determination that a postemployment covenant not to compete, contained in Boisen’s employment contract with Petersen Flying Service, Inc., was invalid. We affirm the judgment of the district court for Kearney County declaring the postemployment restraint unenforceable.

The basic facts bearing upon disposition of Petersen Flying’s appeal are not disputed. When neither the terms of a contract nor facts and circumstances demonstrating the intent of the parties are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sidco Paper Company v. AaronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. DOYLESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. Philip G. Johnson & Co. v. SalmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Obstetricians-Gynecologists, P.C. v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Securities Acceptance Corporation v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Huffman v. HuffmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Knox v. CookNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Aon Consulting v. Midlands FinancialNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Chambers-Dobson, Inc. v. SquierNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Polly v. Ray D. Hilderman & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API