Legal Opinion

Hagedorn v. Maly

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1911No. 16,451Published

Appeal from the district court for Cuming county: Guy T. Graves, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

This is an action in equity to restrain the defendants from cutting a dike and from maintaining a ditch so that water will flow over and upon the plaintiff’s land. The plaintiff prevailed, and the defendants appeal.

The plaintiff’s land is east and south of the defendants’ *371farms. The Elkhorn river, into which the water from the territory to the west flows through sloughs, swales and other waterways, is still further eastward. In a state of nature the surface water, which originated upon a considerable area west of the defendants’ land, flowed northeastward into a swale, and thence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. MarleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Jacobson v.Van BoeningNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Nelson v. WirtheleNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API