Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co. v. Buckstaff Bros. Manufacturing Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Lincoln Erost, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.
This action was brought to recover the sum of $215, with interest, alleged to be due upon a written contract for the manufacture of roofing. Omitting unessential details, the contract is as follows: “Date 1-19-05. No. -. Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co., St. Louis, Mo. Please ship Puckstaff Pros. Mfg. Co. When April 1st 05 at Lincoln, Neb. Terms 30 days, 2i 10 days; via-. Delivered F. O. P. St. Louis. 100 rolls 5 ply Shellap roofing, per roll, $2.15. This order is not subject to cancelation. Salesman, J. C. Hitzman. (Signed) Buck-staff Pros. Mfg. Co.”
The petition avers that at the time of taking the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Pierson v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Cahen v. . PlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Gibbons v. BenteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDonough v. SaundersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Olsen v. McMaken & PentzienNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- Diels v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Tacoma Mill Co. v. F. H. Gilcrest Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Jobbers Overall Co. v. E. R. Deputy Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.