Legal Opinion

Olsen v. McMaken & Pentzien

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1941No. 30970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Meyer, District Judge.

In 1937 the defendant was doing revetment work on the Missouri river near Tekamah, Nebraska, under contract with the United States government. This action grows out of an agreement for sale by plaintiff to defendant of rock for use on that project. Both parties allege the agreement was oral, but disagree as to its terms. Plaintiff’s petition contains four causes of action. In the first and second recovery is sought for the balance alleged to be due for rock shipped at the rate of 92 cents per ton f. o. b. Weeping Water, Nebraska, in the third for certain machinery repair…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pope v. AllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Pierson v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Vogt v. SchienebeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. A. J. Neimeyer Lumber Co. v. Burlington & Missouri River RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Eaton v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parmelee v. Chicago Eye Shield Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  2. State Ex Rel. West Virginia Truck Stops, Inc. v. McHughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Storz Brewing Co. v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Baker v. J. C. Watson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Sadler Machinery Co. v. Ohio National, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API