Magnuson v. State ex rel. Jarrett

This was a prosecution for bastardy. Upon a trial appellant was adjudged to be the father of relate ix’s child, and a judgment in the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars for its maintenance rendered against him.

The only specification of error discussed, of those assigned, calls in question the correctness of the court’s ruling in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.

The learned counsel for appellant very earnestly insists that the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and in support of this contention points out several apparent inconsistencies in the evidence…